Single capacity row · historical 110 kV catalogue
The 8,000 kVA Anshan record is a two-winding oil-immersed design with de-energized taps. Its published 11.20 kW no-load and 45.00 kW load-loss figures help frame a comparison, but they do not establish savings against a different capacity, a different winding arrangement or a current replacement design.
Discuss this configuration
Anshan Special Transformer →CATALOGUE IDENTITY
S(F)9-8000/110- Rating
- 8,000 kVA
- Catalogue losses
- 11.20 / 45.00 kW
- No-load current
- 0.85%
- Reference envelope
- 5,210 × 3,390 × 4,600 mm
Extract the 8 MVA electrical reference
Read the S(F)9-8000/110 entry in the first table. That heading identifies two windings and de-energized voltage regulation. Later tables on the same page cover three-winding and on-load designs; their 8,000 kVA rows have different performance and mass and must stay separate.
The primary choices 110/121 kV, secondary choices 6.3/6.6/10.5/11 kV, Ynd11 connection, ±2 × 2.5% taps and 10.5% short-circuit impedance are shared table cells. Obtain confirmation of their application to the particular offered unit. The page does not give the load-loss reference temperature, frequency or a current guaranteed performance schedule.
Scroll this table to read every column →
| Item | Published reference | Buyer action |
|---|---|---|
| No-load loss | 11.20 kW | Retain separately from load-dependent loss. |
| Load loss | 45.00 kW | Ask for reference temperature and current guarantee. |
| No-load current | 0.85% | Confirm measurement basis and agreed tolerance. |
| Voltage / connection | Shared catalogue choices / Ynd11 | Select one ratio and verify the proposed nameplate. |
Source notes: [P1]
Compare equal duties before judging loss or value
If the project needs an 8 MVA supply, ask bidders for the same duty, voltage ratio, taps, cooling rating and loss test basis. A larger unit can have higher absolute catalogue losses while serving a different load requirement. A lower loss number from a three-winding row or a different rating does not make a like-for-like replacement.
Keep the no-load and load-loss guarantees as separate fields. To assess annual energy cost, supply the actual operating hours, load profile and energy price to the engineer performing the study. This catalogue does not provide those inputs or establish a project saving. Do not use the sum of the two loss figures as a constant annual running loss.
The source says 10-type and 11-type lower-loss products can be provided according to requirements, but gives no matched 8 MVA values for those alternatives on this page. Request a separate rating schedule and quotation rather than assigning an assumed percentage improvement.
Fix the requirement
Use the project load requirement to select capacity; do not choose it solely from the loss column.
Normalize the proposals
Record each guaranteed loss, reference temperature, cooling rating and tolerance on one comparison sheet.
Evaluate the duty
Use the same project load profile and commercial scope for each proposal; flag missing inputs.
Source notes: [P1]
Use layout values only for preliminary planning
The 8,000 kVA row lists body mass 10,860 kg, oil mass 5,270 kg and total mass 21,450 kg, with a 1,475 × 1,475 mm rail gauge. The 5,210 × 3,390 × 4,600 mm dimensions are reference values, explicitly subject to customer requirements. They do not include a defined shipping or packed condition.
Ask for current general-arrangement drawings, terminal positions, lifting instructions, foundation reactions and accessory locations. Specify whether cooling is natural or fan-assisted and obtain the rating for each agreed arrangement. The outdoor catalogue conditions are altitude below 1,000 m, ambient +40 to −25 °C and humidity ≤90% at +25 °C, without corrosive gas or obvious contamination. Return actual conditions for review instead of assuming suitability.
Source notes: [P1]
Prepare replacement and commercial acceptance
For replacement work, provide the existing nameplate and connection information, drawings, rail interface and protection requirements. Ask the responsible engineer and manufacturer to approve electrical and mechanical compatibility. The catalogue connection or shared impedance alone cannot establish that two units can operate in parallel.
No verified current price or delivery period is available. Ask for separate prices for the transformer, cooling accessories, oil, agreed tests, transport and any site support. Require dated quotation validity and a lead-time start event, then track approved drawings, factory tests, dispatch and arrival separately. Older standards listed on the source are historical references; specify the applicable current project requirements in the offer.
Source notes: [P1]
Prepare a configuration-specific inquiry
Confirm whether this is a new installation or an 8 MVA replacement.
0 of 6 items prepared
Copy and complete this RFQ
Replace the brackets with your project information. This preparation tool stays in your browser; it does not submit an enquiry.
Buyer questions
Is a newer 10-type or 11-type design automatically cheaper to run?
The source offers those alternatives but supplies no matched values here. Compare their actual guarantees at the same project duty.
Can I treat 56.20 kW as a constant operating loss?
No. No-load and load-loss values refer to different conditions. An annual study needs the project load profile and matched test basis.
Is this compatible with an existing 8 MVA transformer?
Capacity alone is insufficient. Obtain an engineering review of the voltage, connection, taps, impedance and interfaces.
Are the rail and dimensions final?
The manufacturer labels them reference data. Approve current order-specific drawings before site work.
Sources and research scope
Manufacturer material reviewed on 14 October 2026. Published facts and buyer recommendations are distinguished in the sections above. No verified current price, lead time or independent unit test was established.
View 1 research records
8,000 kVA row in first two-winding table; shared voltage/tap/connection/impedance cells, reference physical values, outdoor limits and newer-design offer note.
2026-10-14 · Original manufacturer page read in browserSource references and archived material are retained in the editorial record. Report a correction or provide a current datasheet →